🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.